![]() He explains how his father’s illness inspired him to become a doctor and shares that he was accepted to only one of six biomedical graduate programs.ĭo you think that this part of Andrisse’s story serves as evidence (support) for any claims that you’ve identified so far? Or does it support his general thesis that “people’s prior convictions should not be held against them in pursuit of higher learning?” Please explain your answer.Īndrisse uses his personal experience to repeat a claim he makes in paragraph 3, that “more must be done to remove the various barriers that exist between formerly incarcerated individuals such as myself and higher education.” In these paragraphs, Andrisse returns to his personal story. If you can’t find any evidence, write “none.”Ĭlaim: The more education a person has, the higher their income.Ĭlaim: Similarly, the more education a person has, the less likely they are to return to prison. Below each claim, please write the supporting evidence from paragraphs 15 and 16. Listed below are some claims that Andrisse makes in paragraph 14. Do you think his personal story is good evidence? Does it persuade you to agree with him? Paragraphs 14-16 Do you think his personal story is evidence for statement 1 above, statement 2, both, or neither one? In these paragraphs, Andrisse shares more of his personal story. Now, review paragraphs 11-13 (Early life of crime). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |